Current:Home > StocksAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Streamline Finance
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-24 12:42:56
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (56)
Related
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Stolen packages could put a chill on the holiday season. Here's how experts say you can thwart porch pirates.
- Michigan State selects UNC-Chapel Hill chancellor as next president
- An extremely rare white leucistic alligator is born at a Florida reptile park
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Tony Shalhoub returns as everyone’s favorite obsessive-compulsive sleuth in ‘Mr. Monk’s Last Case’
- Baltimore’s light rail service suspended temporarily for emergency inspections
- Driver strikes 3 pedestrians at Christmas parade in Bakersfield, California, police say
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Woman tries to set fire to Martin Luther King Jr.'s birth home, Atlanta police say
Ranking
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- AP PHOTOS: 2023 images show violence and vibrance in Latin America
- Air Force grounds entire Osprey fleet after deadly crash in Japan
- Missouri House Democrat is kicked off committees after posting photo with alleged Holocaust denier
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Olivia Rodrigo Reveals How She Got Caught “Stalking” Her Ex on Instagram
- Slovak president says she’ll challenge new government’s plan to close top prosecutors office
- Pope Francis makes his first public appearances since being stricken by bronchitis
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
November jobs report shows economy added 199,000 jobs; unemployment at 3.7%
Woman arrested after trying to pour gasoline on Martin Luther King's birth home, police say
Ashlyn Harris Steps Out With Sophia Bush at Art Basel Amid Ali Krieger Divorce
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Driver strikes 3 pedestrians at Christmas parade in Bakersfield, California, police say
Stock analysts who got it wrong last year predict a soft landing in 2024
West Virginia appeals court reverses $7M jury award in Ford lawsuit involving woman’s crash death